Readify

Brett Glasby

I'll Be Gone in the Dark

Brett Glasby was a local burglar whose reputation and proximity to two Goleta double murders made him an early suspect. Santa Barbara investigators continued to regard him as likely responsible even after his death, but the physical evidence never connected him to the crimes; a DNA link established decades later exposed the limits of that suspicion and made him another red herring in the case.

Identity and Background

Investigators first considered Glasby as a suspect in 1980. He was known locally for his violent temper and hostility, and the account describes him as a burglar with a reputation that inspired no praise. He lived in the area targeted by the killer and had access to a .38 Smith & Wesson, a type of firearm used in the murders of Robert Offerman and Debra Alexandria Manning.

Glasby was also tangentially connected to Robert Offerman through a separate suspected crime: he and associates were prime suspects in the beating of a janitor who worked in Offerman’s office building. That connection placed Glasby near Offerman’s world, but it did not establish a link to the murder.

Suspicion and the Evidence

The circumstances made Glasby a plausible suspect to investigators: he lived within the target area, had a criminal reputation, and could access a firearm of the same type used in the Offerman and Manning murders. But ballistics tests ruled out the gun available to him, and investigators found no physical evidence connecting him to either that killing or the murders of Cheri Domingo and Gregory Sanchez.

The distinction between a compelling profile and proof remained consequential. Santa Barbara investigators continued to believe Glasby was likely responsible for both double homicides, but the evidence described in the account did not substantiate that conclusion. His reputation and access supplied reasons to investigate him, not confirmation that he was the killer.

Death and the Investigative Timeline

In 1982, Glasby and his brother Brian were vacationing in Mexico. They went to a beach in San Juan de Alima believing they were meeting someone for a drug deal; the meeting was a setup, and both brothers were robbed and shot to death. Glasby’s death closed off any possibility of resolving the suspicions through further investigation of him, but it did not end the authorities’ belief in his guilt.

The chronology eventually made that belief difficult to reconcile with the broader case. Orange County investigators later linked the Goleta murders by their methods to the Original Night Stalker, whose last known crime occurred in 1986—four years after Glasby had been killed. Nevertheless, the Santa Barbara investigation retained its view that Glasby was likely responsible for the Offerman-Manning and Sanchez-Domingo murders.

Reassessment and Significance

Locals used the name Creek Killer for the unknown perpetrator associated with a thwarted attack and the two double murders. Because the three targeted couples were unmarried, some people speculated that the killer was a religious zealot punishing people he considered to be living in sin. These were community interpretations, not established facts about Glasby or the killer.

In 2011, investigators successfully developed a DNA profile from degraded genetic material recovered from a blanket at the Sanchez-Domingo crime scene. The profile conclusively linked the Goleta cases to the East Area Rapist / Original Night Stalker. That result displaced the long-held suspicion of Glasby: like Joe Alsip, he proved to be another red herring. His place in the story is therefore not as a solved culprit, but as an example of how a convincing suspect can remain central to an investigation despite the absence of physical proof—and how later forensic evidence can overturn that certainty.

Related StoryFlow